Where will the cabinet operate?
Record indoor, coastal, wash-down, food-preparation, clinical or chemical-exposure conditions.
MATERIAL SELECTION GUIDE
304 is commonly considered for general indoor cabinets where the environment and cleaning products are compatible. Review 316 or 316L when chloride exposure is a concern, with the exact grade confirmed for the project. Neither grade is corrosion-proof: compare cleaning chemicals, contact time, temperature, rinsing, drainage and component coverage before deciding.
ASSDA describes 304 as a widely used general-purpose stainless grade and 316 as having better resistance to pitting in chloride environments. That difference does not replace application review. Weld condition, finish, maintenance, temperature and cleaning chemistry also matter, and the buyer must identify any mandatory project requirement.
Use the application to frame the questions, rather than selecting a grade from the product name alone.
| Application | Selection starting point | Information to check |
|---|---|---|
| General indoor cabinets | Consider 304 where the service conditions and cleaning products are compatible. | Cleaner, contact time, finish, welds and which cabinet parts the grade covers. |
| Food-trailer sinks and worktops | Review the actual wet service and chloride exposure; do not assume every sink needs the same grade. | Water and cleaner exposure, rinsing, drainage, seams and sink-to-worktop interfaces. |
| Enclosure trays and feeder supports | Review 316/316L where chloride-related exposure calls for it; confirm the grade for each part. | Cleaning or sanitising product, concentration, temperature, retained moisture and removal access. |
316 offers greater resistance to pitting in chloride environments than 304, but is not immune to corrosion. Read ASSDA's grade-selection explanation.
316L is the low-carbon variant of 316. ASSDA notes its use in welded components to reduce the risk of sensitisation corrosion, while describing the general corrosion resistance of 316 and 316L as the same. Put the exact grade, material standard and component coverage in the schedule so these requirements can be checked against the material evidence. If these are not yet decided, mark them for review.
Ready to discuss the part? Request a food-trailer component quote or send an enclosure component brief. Rough dimensions, quantity and destination are enough to begin a review.
These authorised manufacturing-partner photographs show relevant construction and configuration details. They do not prove the material, thickness, certification or specification of a future order.
Finish, seams, corners and interfaces must be reviewed together with the nominated stainless grade.
The body, shelves, back, doors and internal fittings should not be assumed to share one grade or thickness.
Use this table as a purchasing brief. Final values and inclusions are confirmed only in the approved drawing, written specification and accepted quotation.
These questions expose scope gaps that can change price, fabrication, packing or site responsibility.
Record indoor, coastal, wash-down, food-preparation, clinical or chemical-exposure conditions.
List food, salt, cleaners, sanitisers, acids, alkalis and any prolonged wet contact.
Do not assume a 304 or 316 label automatically covers the entire assembly.
The buyer and relevant project consultant should identify mandatory site or regulatory requirements before order approval.
Known information can be sent now. Mark unresolved items TBC instead of allowing the supplier to guess.
316 generally offers better resistance to pitting in chloride environments, but the suitable choice depends on exposure, temperature, cleaning chemistry, fabrication, finish and maintenance. The project requirement must be reviewed.
A grade name alone does not confirm the complete cabinet or its suitability. The buyer should identify food-contact use, cleanability and any applicable project requirement; material, component coverage and finish are then confirmed in writing.
A mixed material scope can be reviewed, but every component and interface must be clearly identified in the drawing, BOM or written specification.
State the exact grade, material standard, component coverage and drawing revision in the RFQ. Ask how the supplied material records will be matched to the relevant parts or batch. Agree any additional grade-confirmation method, sampling scope and cost before ordering. A material document alone does not verify finished-part dimensions, assembly fit or load capacity. Keep these checks separate in the quotation.
No. Appearance does not verify stainless grade, and a magnet alone does not reliably distinguish 304 from 316. Cold working can alter the magnetic response of austenitic stainless steels. Use material documentation and agree a suitable grade-confirmation method where needed, as discussed in ASSDA guidance on testing for grade confirmation.
No. It provides buyer-side selection questions and references. Product and destination requirements must be confirmed for the actual order.
These sources frame buyer-side specification questions. They do not state that a Tianze product is certified or compliant; final requirements are confirmed for each order.
PROJECT REVIEW
Send your brief to the relevant project review. Include the part or item reference, known dimensions, quantity and destination; mark the material choice TBC if it is not yet decided.
Food-trailer component review →Enclosure component review →
Start a cabinet enquiry →